Skip to content
Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia

software QA services Saudi Arabia

A tester who thinks like your customer before your customer finds the bug

Not every defect is found by a script. We plan the testing, run it by hand where judgment matters, and keep a clean record of every defect, so you launch with a known quality level instead of a hopeful one.

1 to 2

weeks to a test plan and first test cycle

2

languages tested, Arabic RTL included

3

test levels covered: functional, regression, UAT

Test strategyTest case designExploratory testingRegression cyclesUAT coordinationDefect triageArabic RTL testingRelease sign-offRequirements reviewTest reporting

The direct answer

Manual QA is people testing software the way a user would: following written test cases, exploring for surprises, and recording every defect with steps to reproduce it. Test management is the planning and reporting around that work. It fits teams without a dedicated tester, ERP and portal rollouts, and any launch where a missed defect costs money. We supply the plan, the testers and the reports.

Before and after

What this removes.

Developers test their own work

Today

The person who wrote the feature is the only person who checked it, and blind spots go straight to production.

With the system

An independent tester works from the requirements, not the code, and finds what the author could not see.

Nobody knows how good the build is

Today

Release day arrives with opinions instead of evidence, and the go or no-go call is a guess.

With the system

A test report shows what was covered, what failed, what is open and what the risk is, so the decision is informed.

Defects are lost in chat messages

Today

Bugs arrive as screenshots on WhatsApp with no steps, no device and no priority, so fixes stall.

With the system

Every defect is logged with steps, expected result, evidence and severity in one tracker your team already uses.

UAT turns into chaos

Today

Business users test in an unstructured way, report vaguely and run out of time before launch.

With the system

UAT runs from a prepared script, with a schedule, a simple form for feedback and a clear closing rule.

What we build

What lands in your hands.

Test strategy and plan

Scope, risks, environments, entry and exit rules agreed before testing starts.

Test case library

Written cases traced back to requirements, reusable for every later release.

Functional and exploratory testing

Scripted checks plus time-boxed hunting for the unexpected.

Arabic and device coverage

RTL layout, Arabic input, and the phones and browsers your users really have.

Defect management

Triage, severity, retesting and a daily open-defect view.

UAT support and sign-off

Scripts, scheduling and a final quality report for the release decision.

In depth

How it works, and what to decide.

What a test plan actually decides

A test plan is a short agreement, not a thick document. It states what is in scope, what is not, which risks matter most, which environments we test on and what has to be true before testing starts and before it can stop. Without those entry and exit rules, testing never finishes, or finishes only when the date arrives.

We start by reading your requirements, designs and any existing tickets, and we raise ambiguities before a single test is run. Many defects are born here: two documents that disagree, or a rule nobody wrote down. Catching them in review costs a conversation. Catching them in production costs a refund.

Next comes risk-based prioritization. Payment, approvals, data import and anything touching money get deeper coverage. A settings page used twice a year gets a lighter pass. The decision you make is how much risk you are willing to carry at launch, and we show the trade-off in plain terms rather than promising that everything will be perfect.

How the testing cycles run

Testing runs in cycles. In each cycle we execute the planned cases, record the result, log defects and report daily. After the team fixes a batch, we retest each fix and run a regression pass to confirm nothing nearby broke. A typical project needs two to four cycles. Smaller releases may need one.

Alongside scripted cases we run exploratory sessions of 60 to 90 minutes with a defined goal, such as trying to break the checkout with unusual input. Experienced testers find the defects scripts miss this way: odd combinations, interrupted flows, a back button used at the wrong moment.

Defect handling is where many projects lose time. Each defect carries steps to reproduce, expected and actual results, evidence, environment and severity. We hold a short daily triage with your developers to agree priority, so nothing sits unowned. We work in the tracker you already use, whether that is Jira or something simpler.

Arabic, devices and user acceptance

Arabic testing is more than reading labels. We type Arabic into every field, mix Arabic and English in one sentence, check that numbers, dates and currency display correctly, and confirm that layout mirrors properly in right-to-left mode. Common finds are truncated buttons, punctuation on the wrong side and reports that export gibberish.

Device coverage follows your real audience. For a public app that usually means a spread of recent Android and iOS phones and the main desktop browsers. For an internal system it may be one managed browser. We agree the matrix up front so coverage is explicit.

User acceptance testing is the business side confirming the system fits how they work. We prepare scripts in business language, schedule sessions, collect feedback in a simple form and triage it with you. The closing quality report lists what was tested, what is open and our recommendation. The release decision stays with you, but it rests on evidence.

The delivery plan

Five stages. You sign off every one.

Read each stage as a small contract: what we need from you, what lands in your hands, and the sentence that has to be true before we move on.

01 / 05

Requirements review and plan

3 to 5 days

We read what you have, question what is unclear and agree the scope, risks and environments.

What you do
  • Share requirements, designs and access to the build
  • Name the features that matter most
What we deliver
  • A test strategy and plan
  • A list of requirement gaps and questions
  • A device and browser matrix
Exit criteria

We move on when the plan and entry rules are approved.

02 / 05

Test case design

1 to 2 weeks

We write test cases traced to requirements, covering normal paths, edge cases and Arabic specifics.

What you do
  • Review the cases for business accuracy
  • Provide test accounts and sample data
What we deliver
  • A reviewed test case library
  • A traceability view from requirement to case
  • Prepared test data
Exit criteria

We move on when you have signed off the cases for the first cycle.

03 / 05

Execution cycles

2 to 4 weeks

We run the cases, explore beyond them, log defects and retest fixes in repeated cycles.

What you do
  • Join the daily defect triage
  • Fix or decide on each defect promptly
What we deliver
  • Daily test and defect reports
  • Retest results for every fix
  • Regression pass after each fix batch
Exit criteria

We move on when no critical or high defects remain open.

04 / 05

User acceptance support

1 to 2 weeks

We prepare scripts, run the schedule and consolidate feedback from your business users.

What you do
  • Nominate business testers and free their time
  • Give feedback in the agreed form
What we deliver
  • UAT scripts and schedule
  • Consolidated feedback log
  • Triage of every item with your team
Exit criteria

We move on when business owners have signed the acceptance form.

05 / 05

Release report and handover

2 to 3 days

We close the cycle with a clear quality report and hand over the reusable test assets.

What you do
  • Make the release decision
  • Keep the test library for later releases
What we deliver
  • A final quality report
  • The test case library and defect history
  • Advice on what to automate next
Exit criteria

We move on when the release decision is made with the report in hand.

Buyer questions

Asked before signing.

When should we choose manual QA over automation?

Choose manual testing for new features, changing screens, usability judgment and one-off projects. Choose automation for stable flows repeated every release. Most teams need both, and we often start manual then automate the cases that keep repeating.

How do you price a QA engagement?

Price follows scope: number of features, platforms, languages and cycles. After reading your requirements we give a fixed price per release, or a monthly rate if you want embedded testers over a longer program.

Can your testers work inside our tracker and chat tools?

Yes. We log defects in Jira or whichever tracker you use, join your daily stand-up if useful, and report in the channel your team already reads. We do not force a separate tool on you.

Do you test ERP and packaged software, not just custom code?

Yes. Odoo, SAP and other packaged rollouts need testing of configuration, approvals, integrations and reports, which is mostly manual work done against business scenarios. We test the process end to end, from quote to payment, for instance.

What do we receive at the end?

You receive the test case library, the full defect history, the final quality report and a clear list of residual risks. These stay with you and make the next release cheaper and faster to test.

Launch with evidence instead of hope

Share your requirements and your release date. We will propose a test plan and a fixed price within a week.