Skip to content
Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia

generative AI development Saudi Arabia

Generative AI that works on your own documents and your own rules

A chat window on top of a public model is a demo. We build the real thing: retrieval over your files, drafting tools your staff actually use, Arabic and English output, and a hosting choice that fits your data rules.

6 to 10

weeks from scoping to a working pilot

2

languages tested in every release

3

hosting options compared before we build

Document question answeringRetrieval over your filesDrafting assistantsArabic and English outputSummaries with citationsPrompt and output loggingAccess control by roleIn-Kingdom hosting optionsEvaluation test sets

The direct answer

A generative AI application is business software that uses a language model to write, summarize, answer or extract, based on your own content. It fits companies with large document sets, repetitive drafting or slow internal search. We scope one use case, connect it to your data, test it in Arabic and English, and deploy it with logging and access control.

Before and after

What this removes.

Staff paste company data into public chatbots

Today

People already use free AI tools for contracts, emails and reports, and nobody knows what has left the building.

With the system

A sanctioned tool gives them the same speed inside your own access rules, with a record of what was asked.

Answers sound confident and are wrong

Today

A general model invents policy details, prices and clause numbers because it has never seen your documents.

With the system

Answers come from retrieved passages in your files, shown with the source so a reviewer can check in seconds.

Knowledge sits in thousands of PDFs

Today

Finding a clause, a specification or a past decision means asking three colleagues and opening ten folders.

With the system

One search box returns the answer and the page it came from, in Arabic or English.

Arabic output reads like a translation

Today

Drafts come back stiff, mix registers, or drop into English halfway through a paragraph.

With the system

We test and tune for Saudi business Arabic, so the first draft needs editing, not rewriting.

What we build

What lands in your hands.

Retrieval over your documents

Contracts, manuals, policies and tickets indexed so the model answers from them.

Drafting and summary tools

Reports, replies and meeting notes drafted for a human to review and send.

Copilots inside your software

AI features placed in the screens your team already uses, not a separate site.

Guardrails and logging

Prompt and answer records, role-based access and blocked topics you define.

Evaluation test sets

A fixed list of real questions we rerun every release to catch regressions.

Model and hosting selection

A written comparison of API, private cloud and in-Kingdom options.

In depth

How it works, and what to decide.

How a useful generative AI application is actually built

Most failed pilots skip the unglamorous part. The model is rarely the problem. What matters is the pipeline around it: which documents are ingested, how they are split, how the right passages are found for each question, and how the answer is checked before a person sees it. This pattern is called retrieval-augmented generation, or RAG, and it is how we keep answers tied to your content instead of the model's memory.

We start with one narrow use case, such as answering HR policy questions or drafting replies to supplier queries. We collect fifty to a hundred real questions from the people who will use it, and that list becomes the test set. Every change we make is measured against it. If a new prompt or a new model makes answers worse, we see it before you do.

Choosing the model and where it runs

There are three realistic options. You can call a hosted model through a cloud API, which is fastest to start and cheapest at low volume. You can run the model in a private cloud tenancy, which keeps prompts inside an environment you control. Or you can run an open model on infrastructure inside the Kingdom, which gives the strongest answer to data residency questions but needs more engineering and a capable GPU budget.

The right choice depends on what the prompts contain. Public marketing copy can go to an API. Employee records, patient data or customer contracts usually should not. We put the comparison in writing at the end of the first stage, including cost drivers: token volume, document size, concurrency and how often the index is rebuilt. You decide with the numbers in front of you.

Saudi rules that shape the design

If prompts or documents contain personal data, the Personal Data Protection Law applies to how that data is collected, stored, transferred and deleted. SDAIA publishes the law and its implementing regulations, and its AI ethics principles are a useful checklist for transparency and human oversight. We design logging and deletion so a data-subject request can actually be carried out, and we avoid sending personal data outside the Kingdom unless the legal basis for the transfer is clear.

For regulated sectors and government-linked buyers, cloud and cybersecurity requirements from the National Cybersecurity Authority and the communications regulator may also apply to the hosting choice. We build to those requirements where they apply and flag early when a use case should stay on infrastructure inside the Kingdom. A pilot usually takes six to ten weeks. A production rollout with integrations and access control takes a further four to eight.

The delivery plan

Five stages. You sign off every one.

Read each stage as a small contract: what we need from you, what lands in your hands, and the sentence that has to be true before we move on.

01 / 05

Use case and data review

1 to 2 weeks

We pick one use case worth building, look at the documents behind it, and decide what must stay inside your walls.

What you do
  • Name the team and the task
  • Share sample documents
  • List the questions people really ask
What we deliver
  • A scoped use case and success measure
  • A data sensitivity map
  • A model and hosting comparison
Exit criteria

We move on when the use case, the data and the hosting route are agreed in writing.

02 / 05

Prototype on real content

2 to 3 weeks

We index your documents and build a working version people can try, with sources shown beside each answer.

What you do
  • Try it with real questions
  • Mark wrong or weak answers
  • Name the reviewers
What we deliver
  • A working prototype
  • A first evaluation test set
  • A short list of fixes ranked by impact
Exit criteria

We move on when reviewers agree the answers are good enough to justify a proper build.

03 / 05

Build and integrate

3 to 5 weeks

We connect the application to your login, your storage and the software your team already uses.

What you do
  • Provide access to systems
  • Confirm roles and permissions
  • Review progress weekly
What we deliver
  • Single sign-on and role-based access
  • Prompt and answer logging
  • Arabic and English interface
Exit criteria

We move on when a pilot group can use it in their normal workflow without our help.

04 / 05

Pilot and tuning

2 to 4 weeks

A small group uses it daily while we measure answer quality, speed and cost, and tune what falls short.

What you do
  • Run the pilot with a named group
  • Report problems as they happen
  • Review the usage summary
What we deliver
  • Weekly quality reports
  • Tuned prompts and retrieval
  • A cost-per-month estimate at full rollout
Exit criteria

We move on when quality on the test set meets the bar you set in stage one.

05 / 05

Rollout and support

ongoing

We widen access, monitor quality, and keep the index current as your documents change.

What you do
  • Announce it to staff
  • Send feedback and new use cases
  • Approve model changes
What we deliver
  • Monitoring and alerts
  • Scheduled index refreshes
  • A monthly quality and cost review
Exit criteria

We move on when support is running on an agreed cadence and you know who to call.

Buyer questions

Asked before signing.

Will our documents be used to train a public model?

No. We use providers and settings where your prompts and files are not used for training, and we put that in the written hosting comparison. If you want zero third-party processing, we can run an open model on infrastructure of your choosing instead.

How do you stop the model from making things up?

We answer only from retrieved passages, show the source beside every answer, and instruct the system to say it does not know when nothing relevant is found. We also rerun a fixed test set every release, so quality drops are caught before users see them.

Does it work properly in Arabic?

Yes, but it has to be tested rather than assumed. We evaluate Arabic and English separately, include Modern Standard Arabic and Gulf phrasing in the test set, and pick the model that scores best on your questions, not on a general leaderboard.

What drives the cost of a generative AI project?

Four things: how many documents and how messy they are, how many integrations you need, which model and hosting route you pick, and how many users query it daily. We give a fixed price for the pilot and a monthly running estimate for production.

Who owns the code and the index?

You do. The application code, prompts, test sets and the document index are delivered to you with documentation. If you later change vendors or hosting, you can take everything with you.

Ready to put generative AI to work on your documents

Tell us the task and the kind of documents behind it. We will come back with a scoped pilot, a hosting recommendation and a fixed price.